Broccoli and Tomatoes: Why Chicks Dig Other Chicks

broccoli-tomato.jpg

Both the Huffington Post and the New York Times have recently gotten really interested in girl-on-girl action (but don’t worry, this has nothing to do with Lindsay Lohan and Sam Ronson. Absolutely nothing. Seriously. Nothing). They’ve gotten so interested, in fact, that they’ve dedicated whole columns to trying to figure out why it seems like chicks dig other chicks.

Let me break it down for them (and you, if you really don’t know): chicks dig chicks because we’ve been taught to dig chicks.

Why do women seem to have a more fluid sexuality than men – at least that anyone will admit? Because since we came shrieking out of the womb, we’ve seen images of women in every stage of undress – including naked. Advertisements for razors with long, leisurely shots of legs. TV shows that have a mandatory wardrobe of tight clothes and short skirts. A bajillion movies where tits and ass flash across the screen so often that we eventually forget guys even have body parts. Music videos full of bling and boob. Reality TV where hot tubs are as mandatory as microphones. Porn (who could forget porn?). I mean, it’s not an old argument that the media is saturated with the female form.

So why are we all puzzled that girls get a little aroused when they see other naked or semi-naked girls?

I’m no scientist, but if all I saw were images of broccoli strewn over the airwaves for 25 years, I’m sure I’d think pretty differently about broccoli. The media would have formed my appreciation of broccoli. Broccoli would be part of my daily life.

See what I’m getting at?

And in the same way, if tomatoes were also all over the airwaves, but not as prevalent as broccoli, I’m sure I’d be more comfortable around broccoli (in this analogy, tomatoes equal the male form). Sure, chiseled chests and naked guys are around, but brocc – I mean, the sexualized female form – is more prevalent.

Vegetables aside, it’s obvious to anyone with a brain that society tells most of us what to do and how to think, and for 25 years, I’ve been taught to equate the female form with sexuality, pleasure, and beauty.

So don’t get all surprised if my pulse runs a little quicker when I stumble across a nip slip on the internet. It doesn’t mean I’m gay.

It just means society is working.

Related Posts:

4 Comments

  1. ascendingPig says :

    The issue they were discussing wasn’t about how women are aroused by women as well as men. It was about how women appear to be aroused not by women or men but by sex. Women are aroused regardless of who’s doing the sex-ing and, unlike men, aren’t aroused by pictures of naked men and women doing mundane, nonsexual things.

  2. Carina says :

    I took a Women’s studies class, and one huge concept of the class was the lesbian contiuum! It pretty much says ALL women are lesbians in the sense that all women support eachoter in one way or another. At one side of the spectrum straight women that simply appreciate other women and the other side women that are actually sexual with other women. And the idea our teacher wanted us to take was that we all fell in the middle cuse sexuality is fluid! (which i guess contributes to why women are turned on by eachother?)

    just thought i’d share the idea that we are ALL lesbians with everyone and see what they thought :)

  3. E says :

    I have nothing to say except that I LOVE THIS and it speaks the truth. Gonna pass this around to everyone I know.

  4. Alexa says :

    You *clearly* have no idea what you’re talking about. You need to pick up a copy of Lisa Diamond’s new book on female sexual fluidity and read it.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*
Please enter a valid email.


- Why ask? This confirms you are a human user!

*
Close
E-mail It